Tag Archives: petition

World Day Against Trafficking in Persons

Today, Thursday 30th July, we observe World Day Against Trafficking in Persons to raise awareness about the increasing exploitation of women through surrogacy. The United Nations reports that the number of victims being trafficked globally continues to rise each year and we have tracked 29 publicly reported cases in which surrogacy and egg harvesting has been linked to allegations or findings of human trafficking, exploitation or organised criminal activity between 2018 and 2025.

These cases involve the recruitment and movement of women across borders in countries including the United States, Argentina, Cambodia, China, Georgia, Greece, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, the Philippines, Russia, Spain and Vietnam.

Earlier this month, Thai authorities arrested two Chinese nationals wanted over an alleged illegal commercial surrogacy operation. Investigators allege that a 43 year old man and a 33 year old woman recruited Thai women for an illegal surrogacy agency which they managed alongside an unlicensed medical facility for egg harvesting and embryo implantation. According to reports, women rescued during the investigation alleged they were repeatedly injected with ovulation-stimulating hormones before undergoing egg harvesting procedures. This follows a similar operation we highlighted for World Day Against Trafficking in Persons last year, where over 100 women were trafficked to Georgia. The women were recruited via Facebook under false promises of gestational surrogacy and were also held for egg harvesting.

The women  “were lured in by a job offer on Facebook, promising them a salary between 11,500 and 17,000 euros (£9,600 to £14,100) to work as surrogates for Georgian couples who could not have children.” We understand that the four Chinese nationals arrested in connection to these crimes remain in custody.

Just weeks earlier, the Philippines National Bureau of Investigation’s Human Trafficking Division dismantled an alleged illegal surrogacy operation after a surrogate mother bravely blew the whistle. House of Surrogacy PH recruited financially disadvantaged women through deceptive arrangements. A second site holding the women captive was found and authorities also uncovered possible falsified birth certificates for the babies.

Following the discovery, NBI Director Melvin Matibag said: “No individual should be treated as a commodity or be exploited because of their circumstances.”

These cases only reinforce concerns that women are increasingly being recruited through social media, trafficked across borders, isolated from support networks and exploited for reproductive purposes – and we are not the only ones who have noticed. In May, the UK’s Independent Anti-Trafficking Commission report “Anticipating Exploitation: A Futures Analysis” identified ‘forced’ and ‘coerced’ surrogacy as forms of reproductive exploitation.

As exploitation and human trafficking in surrogacy is happening right now, somewhere in the world, stakeholders and beneficiaries seek to rationalise and justify surrogacy through so-called ‘regulation‘ and law reform. Laws may change the way surrogacy is organised, but existing frameworks that ‘regulate’ this ‘pathway to parenthood’ have not consistently prevented abuses or addressed the inequalities that drive many women to engage with surrogacy.

Rather than assuming that better regulation will make surrogacy ‘ethical’, we should ask whether a practice that depends on separating a baby from their birth mother, while exposing women to significant medical risks and creating opportunities for exploitation, can ever truly be made ‘safe’.

We remind readers that a UK petition calling for parental rights to be transferred at birth (leaving women with no legal recourse as parental rights and responsibilities would be terminated at birth) will be debated on 7th September. The couple behind the petition obtained a baby from a single mother in the USA.

Write to your MP and if you need support to register your concerns with your representative, please email us for assistance on stopsurrogacynowuk@gmail.com

Please write to your MP…again!

**UPDATE: This petition will be debated on Monday 7th September 2026**

Call for MP to oppose petition reforms and raise concerns in parliamentary debate

You may be aware of a government petition launched by fashion owner and social media influencer, Adam Frisby. He and husband Jamie would like to change the Surrogacy Arrangements Act to have the law recognise parental rights at birth.

Jamie and Adam went abroad to Connecticut, USA to obtain a baby from a single mother. Krista gave birth to Leven Rose in January, and by law Krista is rightly the legal parent here, even with a pre-birth order under the commercial contract she signed with Circle Surrogacy.

Transferring parental rights at birth would see a significant shift, one that not even the Law Commission in their 2023 report and Draft Bill suggested. Under the proposed ‘new pathway’ parental rights at birth along with the removal of the birth mother’s name from the birth certificate were proposed, but this was not suggested for international surrogacy. The Law Commission had a whole chapter in their Core Report arguing for the Parental Order process to remain in place.

As the petition secured over 100,000 signatures it is likely that there will be a debate, so we ask you to write to your MP to highlight the key issues with this proposal:
1. No oversight from courts: Right now, there’s at least one formal, straightforward application – a parental order. Surrogacy arrangements are checked and officially recorded before legal parenthood is transferred. It’s not perfect, but it’s the only point where any real scrutiny happens. Removing this means less transparency and accountability.
2. No safety checks: Unlike adoption, surrogacy already has much less safeguarding, but this petition calls for zero checks. At the moment, social workers do home visits but by removing CAFCASS even that basic safeguard would be lost and background checks wouldn’t be required either.
3. Concerns on consent: The current system makes sure the birth mother can give full and free consent and importantly this is ongoing, after the baby is born. Changing this to decisions made before birth could lock things in too early and take away her ability to change her mind. That risks shifting UK surrogacy even closer to commercial surrogacy with pre-birth orders seen in contracts in Ukraine and the USA. This is a significant shift away from the type of surrogacy the public generally endorses.

If you would like to go further…please include:

  • Health risks for surrogate mothers: Evidence from Canada, which operates a similar ‘expenses only’ systems as the UK, shows that surrogate pregnancies carry high risks – x3 – for severe pregnancy complications like sepsis, preeclampsia, and postpartum haemorrhage.
  • Growing international concern: A 2025 report from the UN Special Rapporteur for Violence Against Women and Girls found that surrogacy cannot be made safe and she warned about risks of exploitation and human trafficking. Reem Alsalem’s recommendation was to prohibit surrogacy.
  • Surrogacy is a crime against humanity: as a form of reproductive violence and the sale of children, surrogacy is included in proposals from the UN Special Rapporteur for member states’ consideration to expand the list of crimes against humanity
  • Surrogacy is human trafficking: A newly released report from the Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioning names “coercive surrogacy”, “forced surrogacy” and egg harvesting as forms of reproductive exploitation.
  • Public support for reform is unclear: The 2019 consultation from the Law Commission showed that more than half of respondents actually supported banning surrogacy altogether.
  • UK Involvement and Facilitation in a global baby buyers market: We have seen an increasing numbers of UK residents are going abroad for surrogacy, especially since 2021, often to countries with weaker or no regulations and cheap deals. Changes would make the UK complicit in a global industry linked to exploitation and trafficking. (See the Annual Report from the Modern Slavery Line, Unseen below)
  • Access to banned practices: Some of these countries allow practices illegal in the UK, such as sex selection. Many of the clinics abroad would not meet UK HFEA guidance of implanting one embryo at a time.
  • High-risk environments: Surrogacy arrangements are happening in conflict zones like Ukraine and countries with concerns about corruption and exploitation, such as Nigeria, where British citizens cannot adopt from due to concerns of corruption and human trafficking.
  • Conflict with UK law and values: the UK has commitments under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and the Human Rights Act 1998, and ignoring the harms of a global industry (projected to be worth over $200bn by 2035) women are exploited and children are treated as commodities for trade.

Please conclude your letter by asking your MP to raise these concerns, oppose the reforms and to attend the parliamentary debate and it would be very helpful to us if you could let us know if you receive a response.

If you need support in sending an email please contact us at stopsurrogacynowuk@stopsurrogacynowuk

Thank you!

Lexi Ellingsworth

Further information:

  1. Report from Women’s Policy Centre – written by Lexi Ellingsworth
    https://www.womenpolicycentre.com/the-case-for-a-universal-ban-on-surrogacy/
  2. UN Report on Surrogacy
    https://docs.un.org/en/A/80/158
  3. 2024 Annual Report from Modern Slavery Helpline, Unseen: “Forced surrogacy was reported to the Helpline for the first time in 2023, a total of four times, with one case indicating various types of exploitation. Forced surrogacy cases involve a potential victim forced or coerced into carrying a pregnancy for another individual. In total, 104 cases were recorded where it was indicated that potential victims experienced various types of exploitation. This is an increase of 6% from 591 the previous year.” https://www.unseenuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Unseen-Helpline-Annual-Assessment_2023.pdf